SARS-CoV-2 infection and myocarditis / Infección por SARS-CoV-2 y miocarditis

COVID-19 es una enfermedad infecciosa respiratoria aguda, causada por el SARS-CoV-2, un nuevo coronavirus, que se extendió rápidamente por todo el mundo, dando como resultado una pandemia. Los pacientes presentan un amplio espectro de manifestaciones clínicas, entre ellas, la miocarditis, y de manera alterna, algunos pacientes sin síntomas de enfermedad cardíaca, tienen anomalías en las pruebas, como elevación de la troponina y arritmias cardíacas en el electrocardiograma, o anomalías en las imágenes cardíacas. La patogenia del compromiso miocárdico no es clara, pero las dos principales teorías prevén un papel directo de la enzima convertidora de angiotensina 2, que funciona como el receptor viral, y una respuesta hiperinmune, que también puede conducir a una presentación aislada. El estándar de oro del diagnóstico es la biopsia endomiocárdica, la cual no está disponible en la mayoría de los escenarios. En esta revisión, se pretende brindar al lector pautas para identificar las manifestaciones clínicas, ayudas diagnósticas y manejo de los pacientes con sospecha de miocarditis por COVID-19

COVID-19 is an acute respiratory infectious disease caused by a new coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2 virus, that spread rapidly around the world, resulting in a pandemic. Patients present with a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations, including myocarditis, and alternately, some patients without symptoms of heart disease have abnormalities in tests, such as elevated troponin, arrhythmias in the ECG orabnormalities in cardiac imaging testing. The pathogenesis of myocardial involvement is not completely clear, but the two main theories suggest a direct role of the angiotensin-converting enzyme, which functions as the virus receptor, and a hyperimmune response, which can also lead to an isolated presentation. The gold standard for the diagnosis is the endomyocardial biopsy, which is not available in most settings. In this review, we intend to provide the reader with guidelines to identify the clinical manifestations, diagnostic tools, and management of patients with suspected COVID-19 myocarditis

Clustering of clinical and echocardiographic phenotypes of covid-19 patients.

We sought to divide COVID-19 patients into distinct phenotypical subgroups using echocardiography and clinical markers to elucidate the pathogenesis of the disease and its heterogeneous cardiac involvement. A total of 506 consecutive patients hospitalized with COVID-19 infection underwent complete evaluation, including echocardiography, at admission. A k-prototypes algorithm applied to patients' clinical and imaging data at admission partitioned the patients into four phenotypical clusters: Clusters 0 and 1 were younger and healthier, 2 and 3 were older with worse cardiac indexes, and clusters 1 and 3 had a stronger inflammatory response. The clusters manifested very distinct survival patterns (C-index for the Cox proportional hazard model 0.77), with survival best for cluster 0, intermediate for 1-2 and worst for 3. Interestingly, cluster 1 showed a harsher disease course than cluster 2 but with similar survival. Clusters obtained with echocardiography were more predictive of mortality than clusters obtained without echocardiography. Additionally, several echocardiography variables (E' lat, E' sept, E/e average) showed high discriminative power among the clusters. The results suggested that older infected males have a higher chance to deteriorate than older infected females. In conclusion, COVID-19 manifests differently for distinctive clusters of patients. These clusters reflect different disease manifestations and prognoses. Although including echocardiography improved the predictive power, its marginal contribution over clustering using clinical parameters only does not justify the burden of echocardiography data collection.

[Features of echocardiographic examination in patients with COVID-19].

Novel coronavirus infection has become one of urgent health problems of the 21st century. The associated disorders often result in the development of cardiopulmonary pathology, which requires creation of a new paradigm in diagnosis and treatment. Studies performed during the pandemic have demonstrated an important role of echocardiography (EchoCG) in diagnosis of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction in patients with respiratory insufficiency in COVID-19. The analysis of EchoCG parameters with a high prognostic value showed that in EchoCG, a special attention should be paid to right heart dimensions, RV contractility, and pulmonary artery (PA) systolic pressure, which are the most sensitive indexes of RV afterload and indirect markers of pulmonary disease severity. RV FAC can be recommended for evaluation of the RV systolic function as the most informative variable. Also, it was demonstrated that the RV longitudinal strain has an additional significance for early identification of signs of systolic dysfunction and risk stratification in patients with COVID-19. In addition to the effectiveness and reproducibility of this method, an important advantage of EchoCG is its availability, possibility of saving images for remote interpretation by other specialists, and tracking changes in morphological and functional parameters of the heart. Thus, the analysis of international literature suggests that EchoCG plays an important role in prediction of severe cardiopulmonary disorders and timely selection of the treatment for patients with COVID-19. For these reasons, EchoCG should serve as an additional method of clinical evaluation, particularly in persons with moderate or severe disease.

Feasibility of a point-of-care ultrasound protocol for cardiorespiratory evaluation of horses in different clinical settings.

BACKGROUND: A point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) protocol for evaluation of the cardiac and respiratory systems in horses does not exist. OBJECTIVES: (a) Describe the windows of a POCUS protocol for cardiorespiratory assessment of horses (CRASH); (b) Estimate the number of acoustic windows that can be acquired by a sonographer-in-training; (c) Estimate the time required to complete the protocol for specific groups of horses; (d) Describe the sonographic abnormalities detected in horses presented with cardiovascular, respiratory, or systemic disease. ANIMALS: Twenty-seven healthy horses, 14 horses competing in athletic events, and 120 horses with clinical disease. METHOD: A pocket-sized ultrasound device was used to acquire 7 sonographic cardiorespiratory windows in various clinical scenarios. The duration of the examination was timed, and images were evaluated for diagnostic quality. Abnormalities in horses with clinical disease were determined by an expert sonographer. RESULTS: The CRASH protocol could be performed in healthy and diseased horses in hospital, barn, and competition settings between 5.5 ± 0.9 (athletic horses) and 6.9 ± 1.9 min (horses with clinical disease). Thoracic windows were obtained most consistently, followed by right parasternal long-axis echocardiographic windows. Frequently detected abnormalities were pleural fluid, lung consolidation, B-lines, and moderate-to-severe left-sided heart disease. CONCLUSIONS: The CRASH protocol was feasible using a pocket-sized ultrasound device in various groups of horses, could be completed rapidly in a variety of settings, and frequently identified sonographic abnormalities when evaluated by an expert sonographer. The diagnostic accuracy, observer agreement, and utility of the CRASH protocol merit further evaluation.

Atypical case of infective endocarditis.

A man in his late 40s presented to the emergency department with generalised tiredness and breathlessness. He was a known case of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and also had a recent history of COVID-19. At arrival, he was in respiratory failure. Blood culture grew Streptococcus parasanguinis, a commensal gram-positive bacterium and a primary coloniser of the human oral cavity. Echocardiogram revealed the presence of a flail mitral valve with vegetation suggestive of infective endocarditis. Although biomarkers of inflammation/infection had improved, he continued to be in cardiac failure, and hence he underwent mitral valve replacement with a mechanical valve. This case is unique in many ways; the patient was young, had a history of COVID-19, had native valve infective endocarditis and presented with type 2 respiratory failure and not the usual 'typical' manifestations of infective endocarditis. He had refractory heart failure requiring early valve replacement. His blood culture grew S. parasanguinis, a rare cause for infective endocarditis.

Cardiac Outcome of Children With SARS-CoV-2 Related Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To study the cardiac outcomes of patients with multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) after 6-month of diagnosis. METHODS: This review of hospital records was conducted on MIS-C patients (aged <21 year) who completed a six-month follow up. The baseline demographic, clinical, laboratory, and treatment characteristics during the acute phase, and echocardiographic findings during follow-up were collected. RESULTS: 116 patients (61.2% male, median age 7 years) with MIS-C were included in the study. At the time of admission, cardiac abnormalities were present in 70.7% of MIS-C patients, and the most common cardiac abnormalities were valve failure (50.9%), followed by ventricular dysfunction (39.7%), and pericardial effusion (23.3%). Six month after diagnosis, cardiac abnormalities were found in 10.3% of patients, and patients had lower rates of ventricular dysfunction (P<0.001), valve failure (P<0.001), pericardial effusion (P<0.001), and coronary involvement (P<0.001) as composed to the baseline. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and steroid treatment significantly reduced the odds of occurrence of ventricular dysfunction (P=0.002), valve failure (P=0.004), and low ejection fraction (P=0.002) in comparison to IVIG treatment. CONCLUSION: While most MIS-C patients had abnormal echocardiographic findings at admission, only 10.3% of patients had cardiac abnormalities during follow up.

Abnormal echocardiographic findings after COVID-19 infection: a multicenter registry.

The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has transformed health systems worldwide. There is conflicting data regarding the degree of cardiovascular involvement following infection. A registry was designed to evaluate the prevalence of echocardiographic abnormalities in adults recovered from COVID-19. We prospectively evaluated 595 participants (mean age 45.5 ± 14.9 years; 50.8% female) from 10 institutions in Argentina and Brazil. Median time between infection and evaluation was two months, and 82.5% of participants were not hospitalized for their infection. Echocardiographic studies were conducted with General Electric equipment; 2DE imaging and global longitudinal strain (GLS) of both ventricles were performed. A total of 61.7% of the participants denied relevant cardiovascular history and 41.8% had prolonged symptoms after resolution of COVID-19 infection. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 61.0 ± 5.5% overall. In patients without prior comorbidities, 8.2% had some echocardiographic abnormality: 5.7% had reduced GLS, 3.0% had a LVEF below normal range, and 1.1% had wall motion abnormalities. The right ventricle (RV) was dilated in 1.6% of participants, 3.1% had a reduced GLS, and 0.27% had reduced RV function. Mild pericardial effusion was observed in 0.82% of participants. Male patients were more likely to have new echocardiographic abnormalities (OR 2.82, p = 0.002). Time elapsed since infection resolution (p = 0.245), presence of symptoms (p = 0.927), or history of hospitalization during infection (p = 0.671) did not have any correlation with echocardiographic abnormalities. Cardiovascular abnormalities after COVID-19 infection are rare and usually mild, especially following mild infection, being a low GLS of left and right ventricle, the most common ones in our registry. Post COVID cardiac abnormalities may be more frequent among males.

Echocardiographic manifestations during the first 3 months after an episode of COVID-19 and their relationship with disease severity and persistence of symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular manifestations in patients with COVID-19 are associated with dire outcomes. Long COVID syndrome is the persistence of symptoms after acute disease and is found in up to 40% of subjects. There is little information regarding subacute echocardiographic manifestations after COVID-19, and no study has included a Mexican mestizo population. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included subjects older than 18 with an episode of COVID-19 in the last 3 months. Those with previously known cardiovascular disease were excluded. The patient´s medical history and COVID-19 information were obtained from clinical charts. We performed a transthoracic echocardiogram in every subject and determined left ventricular (LV) index mass, LV ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV GLS), right ventricular (RV) GLS, and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE). A descriptive and comparative analysis was performed based on symptom severity and persistence. RESULTS: One hundred subjects were included; 63% were classified with mild and 37% with moderate to severe COVID-19. The median of LVEF was 60% (55-60), LV GLS and RV GLS was impaired in 34% and 74% of patients, respectively. Patients with moderate to severe disease had significantly lower LVEF (Mean Difference: -3.3), TAPSE (mean difference: -1.8), and higher (worse) LV GLS (Mean Difference: 2.5) and RV GLS (mean difference: 2.9). Persistent symptoms were associated with lower TAPSE and higher RVGLS. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who recover from COVID-19 have a high prevalence of subtle RV and LV dysfunction using GLS analysis. A moderate to severe episode was associated with worse RV and LV function measured by RV GLS, TAPSE, and LV GLS. Subjects with persistent symptoms had worse RVGLS and TAPSE.

Agreement between cardiac output measurements by pulse wave analysis using the Pressure Recording Analytical Method and transthoracic echocardiography in patients with veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy: An observational method comparison.

BACKGROUND: Measuring cardiac output (CO) is important in patients treated with veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vvECMO) because vvECMO flow and CO need to be balanced. Uncalibrated pulse wave analysis with the Pressure Recording Analytical Method (PRAM) may be suitable to measure CO in patients with vvECMO therapy. OBJECTIVE: To assess the agreement between CO measured by PRAM (PRAM-CO; test method) and CO measured by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE-CO; reference method). DESIGN: A prospective observational method comparison study. SETTING: The ICU of a German university hospital between March and December 2021. PATIENTS: Thirty one adult patients with respiratory failure requiring vvECMO therapy: 29 of the 31 patients (94%) were treated for COVID-19 related respiratory failure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: PRAM-CO and TTE-CO were measured simultaneously at two time points in each patient with at least 20 min between measurements. A radial or femoral arterial catheter-derived blood pressure waveform was used for PRAM-CO measurements. TTE-CO measurements were conducted using the pulsed wave Doppler-derived velocity time integral of the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) and the corresponding LVOT diameter. PRAM-CO and TTE-CO were compared using Bland-Altman analysis and the percentage error (PE). We defined a PE of <30% as clinically acceptable. RESULTS: Mean ±â€ŠSD PRAM-CO was 6.86 ±â€Š1.49 l min -1 and mean TTE-CO was 6.94 ±â€Š1.58 l min -1 . The mean of the differences between PRAM-CO and TTE-CO was 0.09 ±â€Š0.73 l min -1 with a lower 95% limit of agreement of -1.34 l min -1 and an upper 95% limit of agreement of 1.51 l min -1 . The PE was 21%. CONCLUSIONS: The agreement between PRAM-CO and TTE-CO is clinically acceptable in adult patients with vvECMO therapy.

Early triage echocardiography to predict outcomes in patients admitted with COVID-19: a multicenter study.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiac involvement seems to impact prognosis of COVID-19, especially in critically ill patients. We aimed to assess the prognostic value of right ventricular (RV) and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, evaluated by bedside triage echocardiography (echo), in patients admitted to emergency departments (ED) in the US with COVID-19. We also assessed the feasibility of using cloud imaging for sharing and interpreting echocardiograms. METHODS: Patients admitted to three reference EDs with confirmed COVID-19 underwent triage echo within 72 h of symptom onset with remote interpretation. Clinical and laboratory data, as well as COVID-19 symptoms, were collected. The association between echo variables, demographics and clinical data with all-cause hospital mortality and intensive care unit (ICU) admission was assessed using logistic regression. RESULTS: Three hundred ninety-nine patients were enrolled, 41% women, with a mean age of 62±16 years. Mean oxygen saturation on presentation was 92.3± 9.2%. Compared to in-hospital survivors, non-survivors were older, had lower oxygen saturation on presentation, were more likely to have a chronic condition and had lower LV ejection fraction (50.3±19.7% vs. 58.0±13.6%) (P < .05). In the cohort, 101 (25%) patients had moderate/severe LV dysfunction, 131 (33%) had moderate/severe RV dysfunction. Advanced age and lower oxygen saturation were independently associated with death and ICU admission. LV and RV function, or other echo variables, were not independent predictors of outcomes. CONCLUSION: In patients admitted with COVID-19 undergoing early echo triage, the independent predictors of death and ICU admission were age and oxygen saturation. The inclusion of echo variables did not improve prediction of unfavorable outcomes.

Echocardiography Before Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Refractory Respiratory Failure: SARS-CoV-2 Infection Versus Other Etiologies.

OBJECTIVES: The study authors hypothesized that in patients with SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19-related refractory respiratory failure requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support echocardiographic findings (just before ECMO implantation) would be different from those observed in patients with refractory respiratory failure from different etiologies. DESIGN: A single-center observational study. SETTING: At an intensive care unit (ICU). PARTICIPANTS: A total of 61 consecutive patients with refractory COVID-19-related respiratory failure (COVID-19 series) and 74 patients with refractory acute respiratory disease syndrome from other etiologies (no COVID-19 series), all needing ECMO support. INTERVENTIONS: Echocardiogram pre-ECMO. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Right ventricle dilatation and dysfunction were defined in the presence of the RV end-diastolic area and/or left ventricle end-diastolic area (LVEDA >0.6 and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion [TAPSE] <15 mm. Patients in the COVID-19 series showed a higher body mass index (p < 0.001) and a lower Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (p = 0.002). In-ICU mortality rates were comparable between the 2 subgroups. Echocardiograms performed in all patients before ECMO implantation revealed an incidence of RV dilatation that was higher in patients in the COVID-19 series (p < 0.001), and they also showed higher values of systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) (p < 0.001) and lower TAPSE and/or sPAP (p < 0.001). The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that COVID-19-related respiratory failure was not associated with early mortality. The presence of RV dilatation and the uncoupling of RV function and pulmonary circulation were associated independently with COVID-19 respiratory failure. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of RV dilatation and an altered coupling between RVe function and pulmonary vasculature (as indicated by TAPSE and/or sPAP) are associated strictly with COVID-19-related refractory respiratory failure needing ECMO support.

Intrapulmonary and Intracardiac Shunts in Adult COVID-19 Versus Non-COVID Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ICU Patients Using Echocardiography and Contrast Bubble Studies (COVID-Shunt Study): A Prospective, Observational Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: Studies have suggested intrapulmonary shunts may contribute to hypoxemia in COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) with worse associated outcomes. We evaluated the presence of right-to-left (R-L) shunts in COVID-19 and non-COVID ARDS patients using a comprehensive hypoxemia workup for shunt etiology and associations with mortality. DESIGN: Prospective, observational cohort study. SETTING: Four tertiary hospitals in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. PATIENTS: Adult critically ill, mechanically ventilated, ICU patients admitted with COVID-19 or non-COVID (November 16, 2020, to September 1, 2021). INTERVENTIONS: Agitated-saline bubble studies with transthoracic echocardiography/transcranial Doppler ± transesophageal echocardiography assessed for R-L shunts presence. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Primary outcomes were shunt frequency and association with hospital mortality. Logistic regression analysis was used for adjustment. The study enrolled 226 patients (182 COVID-19 vs 42 non-COVID). Median age was 58 years (interquartile range [IQR], 47-67 yr) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores of 30 (IQR, 21-36). In COVID-19 patients, the frequency of R-L shunt was 31 of 182 COVID patients (17.0%) versus 10 of 44 non-COVID patients (22.7%), with no difference detected in shunt rates (risk difference [RD], -5.7%; 95% CI, -18.4 to 7.0; p = 0.38). In the COVID-19 group, hospital mortality was higher for those with R-L shunt compared with those without (54.8% vs 35.8%; RD, 19.0%; 95% CI, 0.1-37.9; p = 0.05). This did not persist at 90-day mortality nor after adjustment with regression. CONCLUSIONS: There was no evidence of increased R-L shunt rates in COVID-19 compared with non-COVID controls. R-L shunt was associated with increased in-hospital mortality for COVID-19 patients, but this did not persist at 90-day mortality or after adjusting using logistic regression.

Profile of Cardiac Involvement in Children After Exposure to COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence and pattern of cardiac involvement in children post-COVID (coronavirus disease) infection in a tertiary care referral hospital in India. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted including all consecutive children with suspected MIS-C referred to the cardiology services. RESULTS: Of the 111 children with mean (SD) age was 3.5 (3.6) years, 95.4% had cardiac involvement. Abnormalities detected were coronary vasculopathy, pericardial effusion, valvular regurgitation, ventricular dysfunction, diastolic flow reversal in aorta, pulmonary hypertension, bradycardia and intra-cardiac thrombus. The survival rate post treatment was 99%. Early and short-term follow-up data was available in 95% and 70%, respectively. Cardiac parameters improved in majority. CONCLUSION: Cardiac involvement post COVID-19 is often a silent entity and may be missed unless specifically evaluated for. Early echocardiography aided prompt diagnosis, triaging, and treatment, and helps in favorable outcomes.

Abnormal right ventricular echocardiographic findings in recovered patients associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome in COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Right ventricular (RV) echocardiographic changes such as dilation or systolic dysfunction, and pulmonary arterial hypertension were observed in patients with COVID-19. The aim of our study was to determine the frequency of RV echocardiographic changes in patients who have recovered from COVID-19 and to verify the association between severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and echocardiographic findings. METHODS: Patients who had recovered from COVID-19 undergoing outpatient follow-up underwent transthoracic echocardiography, and based on the findings, were divided into two groups: normal and abnormal. It was then verified whether there is an association between SARS and RV echocardiographic abnormalities in recovered patients. RESULTS: The study included 61 patients, with a mean age of 54.2 ± 12.0 years, 57.4% had presented with SARS. The mean period of time between COVID-19 and the echocardiographic examination was 11.9 ± 7.0 months. Patients presented normal left ventricular systolic function. The frequency of RV echocardiographic changes in patients who had recovered from COVID-19 was 44.3%. RV systolic dysfunction was identified in 31.1%, followed by ventricular dilation in 14.7% and pulmonary hypertension in 9.8%. An association was observed between SARS and RV echocardiographic changes in recovered patients during outpatient follow-up (OR: 4.96; 95% CI: 1.37-17.9; p = 0.015). An association was also demonstrated between SARS and RV dilation (p = 0.007) and between SARS and systolic dysfunction (p = 0.028). CONCLUSION: SARS is a risk factor for abnormal RV echocardiographic findings in patients recovered from COVID-19.

Takotsubo syndrome in COVID-19: a case series study.

BACKGROUND: Takotsubo syndrome is a clinical syndrome characterized by an acute and transient left ventricular systolic dysfunction related to an emotional or physical stressful event. CASE PRESENTATION: During the Covid-19 pandemic, five cases of Takotsubo syndrome in hospitalized, mechanically ventilated patients due critical SARS-CoV-2 infection have been identified at our institution. Here we present the electrocardiographic, echocardiographic and angiographic characteristics of this case series. All cases were initially suspected by echocardiography performed due an abnormal electrocardiogram, troponin elevation or clinical deterioration. CONCLUSION: A high index of suspicion should be sought to identify Takotsubo syndrome and other cardiac complications associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection.

["Guiding lights" for the diagnosis of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension in the flow of patients with pulmonary embolism].

On December 13, 2021, an expert council was held to determine the position of experts of different specialties regarding the reasons for the low level of diagnosis of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) in real clinical practice in a pandemic of a new coronavirus infection and possible ways to improve detection in patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) ) in history. The reasons for the low level of diagnosis of CTEPH are the insufficient level of knowledge of specialists, especially primary care physicians; lack of clear regulatory documents and expert centers for the management of this category of patients. Primary diagnosis of CTEPH in a pandemic can be strengthened through the widespread use of telemedicine for consultations of primary care physicians with specialists from expert centers; to maximize the role of echocardiography and computed tomography (CT) as differential diagnostic tools for dyspnea, in particular in patients with COVID-19. To increase the detection rate of CTEPH, diagnostic vigilance is required in patients with risk factors and episodes of venous thromboembolism. To improve the screening of CTEPH, it is necessary to create an algorithm for monitoring patients who have had PE; provide educational activities, including through the media; create materials for patients with accessible information. The regulatory documents should designate the circle of responsible specialists who will be engaged in long-term monitoring of patients with PE. Educational programs are needed for primary care physicians, cardiologists, and other physicians who come into the field of view of patients with CTEPH; introduction of a program to create expert centers for monitoring and managing patients with the possibility of performing ventilation-perfusion lung scintigraphy, cardiopulmonary stress test, CT, right heart catheterization. It seems important to build cooperation with the Ministry of Health of Russia in order to create special protocols, procedures for managing patients with PE and CTEPH.